Fixed Python 2.6 compatibility issue
Select was using "raise 'No Match'" to break from non-matches, this is deprecated
This commit is contained in:
parent
a567e8630f
commit
9fb2b4ff58
1 changed files with 22 additions and 18 deletions
|
@ -1718,12 +1718,14 @@ class KirbyBase:
|
|||
while line:
|
||||
# Strip off newline character and any trailing spaces.
|
||||
line = line[:-1].strip()
|
||||
try:
|
||||
# If blank line, skip this record.
|
||||
if line == "": raise 'No Match'
|
||||
# Split the line up into fields.
|
||||
record = line.split("|", maxfield)
|
||||
# Keep track of matching
|
||||
is_no_match = False
|
||||
# If blank line, skip this record.
|
||||
if line == "": is_no_match = True
|
||||
# Split the line up into fields.
|
||||
record = line.split("|", maxfield)
|
||||
|
||||
if not is_no_match:
|
||||
# Foreach correspond field and pattern, check to see
|
||||
# if the table record's field matches successfully.
|
||||
for fieldPos, pattern in fieldPos_new_patterns:
|
||||
|
@ -1739,23 +1741,26 @@ class KirbyBase:
|
|||
try:
|
||||
if useRegExp:
|
||||
if not pattern.search(
|
||||
self._unencodeString(record[fieldPos])
|
||||
):
|
||||
raise 'No Match'
|
||||
self._unencodeString(record[fieldPos])
|
||||
):
|
||||
is_no_match = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if record[fieldPos] != pattern:
|
||||
raise 'No Match'
|
||||
is_no_match = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
except Exception:
|
||||
raise KBError(
|
||||
'Invalid match expression for %s'
|
||||
% self.field_names[fieldPos])
|
||||
'Invalid match expression for %s'
|
||||
% self.field_names[fieldPos])
|
||||
# If the field type is boolean, then I will simply
|
||||
# do an equality comparison. See comments above
|
||||
# about why I am actually doing a string compare
|
||||
# here rather than a boolean compare.
|
||||
elif self.field_types[fieldPos] == bool:
|
||||
if record[fieldPos] != pattern:
|
||||
raise 'No Match'
|
||||
is_no_match = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
# If it is not a string or a boolean, then it must
|
||||
# be a number or a date.
|
||||
else:
|
||||
|
@ -1776,14 +1781,14 @@ class KirbyBase:
|
|||
# strings works out the same as comparing two
|
||||
# datetime values anyway.
|
||||
elif self.field_types[fieldPos] in (
|
||||
datetime.date, datetime.datetime):
|
||||
datetime.date, datetime.datetime):
|
||||
tableValue = record[fieldPos]
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# If it falls through to here, then,
|
||||
# somehow, a bad field type got put into
|
||||
# the table and we show an error.
|
||||
raise KBError('Invalid field type for %s'
|
||||
% self.field_names[fieldPos])
|
||||
% self.field_names[fieldPos])
|
||||
# Now we do the actual comparison. I used to
|
||||
# just do an eval against the pattern string
|
||||
# here, but I found that eval's are VERY slow.
|
||||
|
@ -1791,12 +1796,11 @@ class KirbyBase:
|
|||
# they are trying to do and I do it directly.
|
||||
# This sped up queries by 40%.
|
||||
if not pattern[0](tableValue, pattern[1]):
|
||||
raise 'No Match'
|
||||
is_no_match = True
|
||||
break
|
||||
# If a 'No Match' exception was raised, then go to the
|
||||
# next record, otherwise, add it to the list of matches.
|
||||
except 'No Match':
|
||||
pass
|
||||
else:
|
||||
if not is_no_match:
|
||||
match_list.append([line, fpos])
|
||||
# Save the file position BEFORE we read the next record,
|
||||
# because after a read it is pointing at the END of the
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue