diff --git a/site/fonts.org b/site/fonts.org deleted file mode 100644 index e8fdd8e..0000000 --- a/site/fonts.org +++ /dev/null @@ -1,13 +0,0 @@ -I'm always looking for new and better fonts. - -- [[http://damieng.com/blog/2008/05/26/envy-code-r-preview-7-coding-font-released][Envy Code R]] :: Another programming font. - - Has a dashed ~0~ (zero). - - It has a bold typeface. - - It has a cursive typeface. - -- [[http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcecodepro.adobe/][Source Code Pro]] :: The monospaced companion of the [[http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcesans.adobe/][first open source - font]] by adobe. - - It has a dotted ~0~ (zero). - - It has a bold typeface. - - It has no cursive typeface, and they don't seem to intend to add - one. diff --git a/site/fonts/envy_code_r.org b/site/fonts/envy_code_r.org new file mode 100644 index 0000000..11e29e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/site/fonts/envy_code_r.org @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +#+TITLE: ryu/ fonts/Envy Code R +#+OPTIONS: toc:nil +#+LANGUAGE: en +#+STARTUP: showall + +* [[http://damieng.com/blog/2008/05/26/envy-code-r-preview-7-coding-font-released][Envy Code R]] + + I *like* that it has a dashed ~0~ (zero) and bold and italic faces. The + parentheses are not bad, but they're not my favorite either. The + differences between ~iI1lLoO0~ are quite clear. + + At first it looked a little thin, but the fact that it has an + italic face was reason enough for me to get used to it and now I + don't notice it anymore. diff --git a/site/fonts/source_code_pro.org b/site/fonts/source_code_pro.org new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d45b1de --- /dev/null +++ b/site/fonts/source_code_pro.org @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +#+TITLE: ryu/ fonts/Source Code Pro +#+OPTIONS: toc:nil +#+LANGUAGE: en +#+STARTUP: showall + +* [[http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcecodepro.adobe/][Source Code Pro]] + + Companion of the [[http://sourceforge.net/projects/sourcesans.adobe/][first open source font by adobe]]. I *dislike* that it + has a dotted ~0~ (zero) and that it has no italic typeface and no + intention of adding one either. I *like* that it has a bold face. diff --git a/site/index.org b/site/index.org index 470888b..2236ee8 100644 --- a/site/index.org +++ b/site/index.org @@ -31,6 +31,12 @@ - Look at some of the [[http://ryuslash.org/mediagoblin/][pictures]] I've uploaded. - - I also have some [[file:fonts.org][notes on fonts]] I have tried. + - I also have some notes on programming fonts I have tried: + [[file:fonts/envy_code_r.org][Envy Code R]], + [[file:fonts/source_code_pro.org][Source Code Pro]], + of which I'm currently using [[file:fonts/envy_code_r.org][Envy Code R]]. - - Or on some [[file:windowmanagers.org][window managers]] I've used. + - Or on some window managers I've used: + [[file:wm/awesome.org][Awesome]], + [[file:wm/stumpwm.org][Stumpwm]], + of which I'm currently using [[file:wm/stumpwm.org][Stumpwm]]. diff --git a/site/windowmanagers.org b/site/windowmanagers.org deleted file mode 100644 index 630381a..0000000 --- a/site/windowmanagers.org +++ /dev/null @@ -1,11 +0,0 @@ -I am barely ever satisfied with my window manager, so I'm always -looking to identify why, what I can do about it and which window -manager allows me to do that. I have a strong preference for -programmable window managers, so that will entail most of the ones -I'll list here. - -- [[http://awesome.naquadah.org/][awesome]] :: Almost everyone knows awesome, it's (one of) the biggest - and best-known tiling window managers around. - - It is an automatic tiler. - - It is configured using lua, this gives it a lot of flexibility, - but lua is far from my favorite language. diff --git a/site/wm/awesome.org b/site/wm/awesome.org new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6b34f37 --- /dev/null +++ b/site/wm/awesome.org @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +#+TITLE: ryu/ wm/Awesome +#+OPTIONS: toc:nil +#+LANGUAGE: en +#+STARTUP: showall + +* [[http://awesome.naquadah.org/][Awesome]] + + An automatic tiling window manager. It can be customized with the + [[http://www.lua.org/][Lua]] programming language. Lua has always had a bit of a bad + reputation with me, but that hasn't stopped me from using this + window manager. I still don't like the language, but with awesome + you can really do a lot cool things. + + It is almost the Emacs of window managers. It has a lot of features + that other "simple" window managers don't bother with, or leave up + to other programs and it has a pretty impressive API for + interacting with it. Of the extensible window managers I have used + this is certainly the most active one at this moment. diff --git a/site/wm/stumpwm.org b/site/wm/stumpwm.org new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ea951ad --- /dev/null +++ b/site/wm/stumpwm.org @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +#+TITLE: ryu/ wm/Stumpwm +#+OPTIONS: toc:nil +#+LANGUAGE: en +#+STARTUP: showall + +* [[http://stumpwm.nongnu.org/][Stumpwm]] + + Written completely in Common Lisp. A manual tiling window manager. + Very low on the "bling" side, but very extensible due to the + language it's written in. It has some strange quirks, it needs a + patch to be able to work with HTML hexadecimal colors and it + isn't actively developed at the moment.