From bada4ecc1a09a3e4a98ae3449f6e6e7e6de19fef Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Willemse
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 03:40:45 +0100
Subject: Initial commit

---
 rlwrapping_sbcl.post | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 rlwrapping_sbcl.post

(limited to 'rlwrapping_sbcl.post')

diff --git a/rlwrapping_sbcl.post b/rlwrapping_sbcl.post
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..32d7138
--- /dev/null
+++ b/rlwrapping_sbcl.post
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+;;;;;
+title: rlwrapping sbcl
+tags: sbcl, lisp, utility
+date: 2013-10-06 13:02
+format: md
+;;;;;
+
+[SBCL](http://sbcl.org) is an excellent lisp implementation. The only
+thing that's not so nice about it is overly simple command-line
+interface. The absence of `<UP>`, `C-a`, `M-b`, etc. can be annoying,
+even though I only occasionally use SBCL directly.
+
+I have 3 solutions to this problem now:
+
+- Use [SLIME](http://common-lisp.net/project/slime/), which is what I
+  do most of the time, but sometimes this isn't practical.
+
+- Use [Linedit](http://common-lisp.net/project/linedit/). I tried
+  this, and it was cool. But somehow I broke it and now I can't get it
+  to work.
+
+- Use [rlwrap](http://utopia.knoware.nl/~hlub/uck/rlwrap/#rlwrap).
+  This requires you to either always invoke SBCL as `rlwrap sbcl` or
+  create an alias for it. This works very well too, is very simple and
+  doesn't noticeably increase start-up time.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3-54-g00ecf